Jump To Navigation
FAQ

CONSTRUCTION LAW IN WASHINGTON STATE

1. Who is considered a "contractor" in Washington State?

Washington defines a contractor broadly. A contractor is any individual or entity that, for a business purpose, undertakes or offers to undertake any project that affects real property. This includes the construction, alteration, repair, improvement, development, movement, wrecking, or demolition of buildings, highways, roads, railroads, or the excavation of anything attached to real property. The statute also specifically includes consultants hired to assist with such projects.

2. What is a General Contractor?

A General Contractor is any individual or entity who uses more than one building trade or craft on a single project or under a single building permit. It also includes any individual or entity that supervises or consults on such a project.

3. What is a Specialty Contractor?

A Specialty Contractor is a contractor who employs only one building trade or craft on a single project or under a single building permit. Further, a Specialty Contractor is not permitted to hire subcontractors unless such subcontracted work is incidental to the Specialty Contractor's work.

4. What is required to lawfully work as a contractor in Washington State?

A contractor (general or specialty) must be registered with the State of Washington Department of Labor and Industries to lawfully work in the state. To become registered, a contractor must submit an application to the Department of Labor and Industries along with evidence of an acceptable type of workers' compensation insurance for the contractor's employees, a surety bond, and liability insurance. The surety bond must be in the amount of $12,000 for a General Contractor, and $6,000 for a Specialty Contractor. As an alternative to a surety bond, a contractor may file an assigned savings account with the Department of Labor and Industries. Liability insurance must be in the minimum amount of $50,000 for property damage and $200,000 for public liability, or $250,000 combined single limit coverage.

Washington State Department of Labor and Industries contractor registration forms:

http://www.lni.wa.gov/TradesLicensing/Contractors/HowReg/default.asp

5. What happens if I am doing work or offering to do work as a contractor but have not registered with the Department of Labor and Industries?

It is a gross misdemeanor to offer to work, submit a bid, advertise, or do work as a contractor in the State of Washington without being registered. A conviction is punishable by up to one year in jail and a $5,000 fine.

Failure to register also subjects the contractor to a possible Consumer Protection Act claim which can include treble damages (up to a maximum of $10,000) and an award of attorney fees and costs.

Further, an unregistered contractor is not permitted to bring or maintain suit for compensation, breach of contract, or any other claim arising from the activity for which the contractor should have been registered for.

6. Are there any exceptions to the requirement to be registered?

Yes. Because the definition of contractor is so broad in Washington, there are quite a few statutory exceptions to the registration requirement. The exceptions include: (1) representatives of federal, state or local government entities; (2) officers of a court; (3) public utilities; (4) contractor activities incidental to discovering or producing gas or petroleum; (5) the sale of finished products that do not become fixtures (as that term is defined under common law); (6) owners working on personal property (such as a mobile home); (7) contractors working within the boundaries of an area under the jurisdiction of the federal government; (8) a person or entity supplying materials, supplies, or equipment to a project who did not fabricate them into the project themselves; (9) projects of a minor, casual, or inconsequential nature so long as the total price of labor, materials, and all other items does not exceed $500, and so long as such person does not advertise or indicate to the public he, she, or it is a contractor; (10) construction projects incidental to irrigation and drainage, farming, or fire prevention; (11) an owner of land who hires a general contractor, unless the owner is hiring the contractor for the purpose of leasing or selling the property (see Question 7 below); (12) a person working on his or her own property or personal residence, unless that person is intending to sell, demolish, or lease the property (see Question 7 below); (13) an owner maintaining or repairing their own property who uses his or her own employees for such purpose; (14) a licensed architect, engineer, electrician, or plumber who is otherwise licensed or certified under the laws of the state of Washington and is acting solely in their professional capacity; (15) an employee of a registered contractor; (16) contractors working on highway projects that have been prequalified with the state Department of Transportation; (17) mobile/manufactured home dealers or manufacturers who subcontract the installation, set-up or repair of mobile/manufactured homes; (18) individuals or entities holding a valid electrical contractor's license that employ a certified electrician or journeyman to perform plumbing work incidental to replacement of household appliances. Many judicial decisions further refine/explain these exceptions.

7. I am the owner of the property I am improving and intend to "flip" it for a profit, do I have to have a contractor's license?

Generally, yes. Clearly such a project meets the "business purpose" portion of the definition of contractor. Further, the property owner exceptions to registration mentioned in Question 6 above specifically do not include individuals or entities performing contractor type work with the intention of leasing or selling improved property that he, she or it has owned for less than twelve months.

8. Who may file a lien on improved property and under what circumstances?

Anyone furnishing labor, professional services, materials, or equipment for the improvement of real property may file a lien against the real property such labor, services, material, or equipment was supplied to (excluding public works projects in which case a retainage claim may arise). However, such labor, services, material or equipment must have been supplied at the request of the owner, owner's agent, or owner's construction agent. Further, the person claiming the lien must be registered as a contractor if that is required under Washington law, and must have provided a Notice to Owner or Notice to Customer if that was required by law. Otherwise a lien cannot be filed.

9. When is a "Notice to Owner" required?

Anyone furnishing professional services, materials, or equipment for the improvement of real property must provide the property owner (and in some circumstances the prime contractor) a Notice to Owner unless:

(1) the lien claimant contracted directly with the owner or owner's common law agent;

(2) the lien claimant is a laborer whose claim is based solely upon performing labor; or

(3) the lien claimant is a subcontractor contracting directly with the prime contractor (except in the case of improvements to an existing owner-occupied single family residence or appurtenant garage, in which case a notice to the owner-occupier must be provided).

10. When should a Notice to Owner be given?

The Notice to Owner can be given at any time, but it only authorizes the lien claimant to claim a lien for services, materials, or equipment supplied in a given period of time. With new construction on a single-family residence, only services, materials, and equipment supplied after providing the notice, and for the ten (10) days before the notice, can serve as the basis for a lien. In all other cases, the lien can be claimed for services, materials, and equipment supplied after the notice and for the sixty (60) day period before providing the notice.

11. When is a "Notice to Customer" required?

Prior to starting work on a project, a contractor offering to perform a contracting project is required to provide the customer (person hiring him/her/it) a Notice to Customer in two circumstances:

(1) Residential. When the project is for the repair, alteration, or construction of four (4) or fewer residential units or accessory structures and the bid or contract price exceeds $1,000.

(2) Commercial. When the project is for the repair, alteration or construction of a commercial project and the bid or contract price is between $1,000 and $60,000. Commercial projects less than $1,000 or more than $60,000 do not require the notice.

The Notice to Customer need not be given when the contractor is working for another contractor. But failure to provide the Notice to Customer, when required, is an infraction.

Sample Notice to Customer:

http://www.lni.wa.gov/Forms/pdf/625030af.pdf

12. How should a Notice to Owner or Notice to Customer be delivered?

Notice to Owner. A Notice to Owner should either be (1) mailed by certified or registered mail to the owner or reputed owner, or (2) delivered or personally served upon the owner or reputed owner, with the lien claimant obtaining evidence of delivery (such as a receipt, affidavit of service, or acknowledgement signed by the owner or reputed owner).

Notice to Customer. The contractor must keep a copy of the Notice to Customer signed by the customer and retain it for at least three years. The Department of Labor and Industries can require a contractor to produce copy of the Notice to Customer signed by the customer.

13. If I meet all the requirements to file a lien, were do I file it and what do I need to include in it?

A lien is filed in the Auditor's office of the county where the real property is located. The lien must contain, (1) the lien claimant's name, address and phone number; (2) the first and last date on which labor, professional services, materials, or equipment were furnished or employee benefits were due; (3) the name of the person indebted to the claimant; (4) the street address, legal description, or other description reasonably describing the real property being liened; (5) the name of the owner or reputed owner of the property, if known; (6) the principal amount for which the lien is claimed; (7) a statement from the claimant, under penalty of perjury, that the claim is true and correct; and (8) the name of the assignee if the lien has been assigned.

Attachment 1 (Sample Claim of Lien).

14. Are there time limits on when I can file and serve a lien?

A claim of lien can only be filed within ninety (90) days of the last day the lien claimant provided labor, professional services, material, or equipment, or the last day employee benefit contributions were due. Liens filed after that time are invalid. Within fourteen (14) days of filing the lien, the lien must also be personally served on the owner or reputed owner, or mailed to the owner or reputed owner by certified or registered mail. Failure to deliver or mail the claim of lien within fourteen (14) days of filing bars the claimant from recovering attorney fees and costs.

15. What property is subject to the lien?

The piece of land that was improved is subject to the lien. But the lien only extends to the interest in the land held by the person who authorized the work. So if a tenant orders work, in many cases only the tenant's leasehold interest can be liened. Under the statute, a common law agent can bind the owner. Consequently, in the example of the tenant, under certain circumstances it has been held that a tenant can expose the landlord's interest in the property to a lien if the tenant was acting as a common law agent of the landlord in ordering the work or improvements. If the property is not subject to a lien, the court can order the improvement removed from the property.

16. How long is my claim of lien good for?

A claim of lien is good for eight (8) months from the date of recording/filing with the county Auditor. To preserve its lien rights, a lien claimant must commence an action to foreclose on the lien prior to the expiration of the eight (8) month period. Any complaint to foreclose the lien must be served within ninety (90) days of filing the complaint. Further, the court action must be prosecuted to judgment within two (2) years of filing the complaint or the action will be dismissed for want of prosecution. The statute provides that these time limitations will be tolled during any period of time the property owner is in bankruptcy.

17. What if I included inaccurate information in my claim of lien?

There is an implied right to amend a lien if doing so can be accomplished within ninety (90) days of the last day the lien claimant provided labor, professional services, material, or equipment, or the last day employee benefit contributions were due. Case law also suggests that the mistake in the original lien had to have been made in good faith. Amendments to correct deliberate, fraudulent, or grossly negligent errors may not be permitted.

18. What if the Claim of Lien is filed without having first provided a required Notice to Owner or Notice to Customer, if it is filed more than 90 days after the last day of work, or if the amount stated in the Claim of Lien exceeds what is actually owed?

If the Claim of Lien was frivolous and made without reasonable cause (as determined by the court), or was excessive, a summary procedure allows the property owner to have the lien removed or reduced. Under such circumstances the lien claimant will be liable for the owner's damages, attorney fees and costs.

19. Are there any other construction project posting requirements?

Yes. For example, for any construction project costing more than $5,000, the prime contractor is required to post at the project for the duration of the project a notice containing, (1) the legal description or tax parcel number, and street address of the construction site; (2) the property owner's name, address, and telephone number; (3) the prime contractor's business name, address, phone number, Washington state contractor's registration number; and (4) either (a) the name, address, and phone number of the lender administering the construction financing, if any, or (b) the name and address of the firm that issued a payment bond, if any.

Further, if the contractor is required to provide a Notice to Customer, the contractor is also supposed to provide customers with informational material published by the state Department of Labor and Industries relating to lien laws. The informational materials can be found at: http://www.lni.wa.gov/IPUB/625-017-000.pdf.

20. What sort of warranty obligations do I have as a contractor under Washington law?

Washington law imposes an implied warranty of habitability on new home builders. The warranty generally exists between the home builder-vendor and the original purchaser of a new home. To violate the warranty, the defects must be so substantial as to make the home uninhabitable.

21. Does a contractor have the right to cure if the customer/owner has a complaint about the work?

No. However, before bringing a lawsuit against a contractor or construction professional for construction defects, Washington law requires the customer/owner to provide written notice of any alleged construction defects at least forty-five (45) days prior to commencing suit. Within twenty-one (21) days after receiving such a notice the contractor or construction professional can offer to inspect the property, repair the work, compromise the claim (monetarily), or dispute the claim. But there is nothing requiring the customer/owner to accept the contractor or construction professional's offer to repair or compromise any claim. These notice requirements only apply to new construction or substantial remodels (defined as a remodel costing more than one-half (1/2) of the tax assessed value of the real property).

22. What does a contractor or construction professional have to do in order to be given notice and an opportunity to inspect, repair, compromise or dispute a claim prior to being sued?

Upon entering into a contract for the sale, construction, or substantial remodel of a residence, the contractor or construction professional must provide the owner a notice in the following form:

CHAPTER 64.50 RCW CONTAINS IMPORTANT REQUIREMENTS YOU MUST FOLLOW BEFORE YOU MAY FILE A LAWSUIT FOR DEFECTIVE CONSTRUTION AGAINST THE SELLER OR BUILDER OF YOUR HOME. FORTY-FIVE DAYS BEFORE YOU FILE YOUR LAWSUIT, YOU MUST DELIVER TO THE SELLER OR BUILDER A WRITTEN NOTICE OF ANY CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS YOU ALLEGE ARE DEFECTIVE AND PROVIDE YOUR SELLER OR BUILDER THE OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE AN OFFER TO REPAIR OR PAY FOR THE DEFECTS. YOU ARE NOT OBLIGATED TO ACCEPT ANY OFFER MADE BY THE BUILDER OR SELLER. THERE ARE STRICT DEADLINES AND PROCEDURES UNDER STATE LAW, AND FAILURE TO FOLLOW THEM MAY AFFECT YOUR ABILITY TO FILE A LAWSUIT.

If this notice is provided upon entering into the contract, notice of a construction defect to the contractor or construction professional by the owner is a pre-requisite to a lawsuit. If the notice is not provided by the contractor or construction professional, no notice need be given to the contractor or construction professional prior to filing suit.

Testimonials

My husband and I recently consulted with Tim about my husband's negative employment situation. Tim was professional, knowledgeable, and sincere. Through Tim we learned that we did not have a legal case and would have to rely on negotiation to achieve a positive result. Tim helped my husband clarify what he really wanted - to leave the job and hopefully receive a severance deal. Tim gave my husband negotiating tips which really paid off. Following Tim's advice my husband negotiated an amicable parting and a generous severance package. We are very happy with the outcome and will recommend Tim and your firm in the future. (client)

I cannot speak highly enough about Mr. Friedman. He took on my case last minute and won. His integrity and attention to detail stood out the most for me. Mr. Friedman is a professional, competent, and extremely ethical lawyer. I highly recommend him for your future endeavors. (client)

We hired Tim to assist us suing our neighbor who was blocking our view due to recent construction. We found Tim to be very knowledgeable regarding property issues. He was also very professional and was always available to answer our questions. My husband and I were so impressed with Tim during the duration of this case that we left money in our account with his office. In the near future we will be using his services and expertise to create wills for us. I highly recommend Tim to anyone seeking representation. It was a pleasure working with him. (client)

Mr. Blado has personally represented my construction firm and me personally for several years now. On occasion, members of his firm have represented me as well.

I have and continue to find Mr. Blado exceptionally knowledgeable about all of the aspects of business, construction and real estate law as they have applied to my many situations. Mr. Blado brings a wealth of experience and practical, problem solving knowledge to the table. He is truly desirous of serving the best interest of his clients. He will provide options and will review the relative merits and weaknesses of each position which may be taken given the issue at hand. Don't let the grin fool you. Although Mr. Blado is a personable fellow, he can (and has been for me) an extremely tough and determined attorney when the situation requires it.

I highly recommend Mr. Blado and his firm for your legal needs.

M.C. (client)

I am the paralegal here at ***, Jon is our attorney and I can say with all confidence that he has surpassed our expectations. Our company uses him and other members of this firm frequently for all our legal needs. *** is an investment company and have had many needs for corporate law issues as well as real easte and contracts. Jon has always been right on top of every issue to come across his desk, even when we have had to deal with other attorneys out of state he follows the process to make sure that we are well cared for. He has always been ahead of the game with his knowledge, promptness and attention to detail. At all times he has made us comfortable in his presence and he is willing to go that extra mile to ensure the quality of his work. We couldn't be happier. Jon deserves a rating of excellent, he has truly earned it. (client)

Jon Blado is an excellent attorney. Jon served as the corporate attorney for Rainier Pacific Bank, and I relied on his counsel for the past 10 years for human resources (employment law, etc), real estate/facilities contracts, etc. Jon is highly responsive, possesses high integrity, delivers exceptional client service, and I would recommend him without reproach. - W.M. (client)

We were on opposite sides of a professional practice acquisition. Jonathan was timely and efficient in his responses. He was practical and fair in his approach. Our clients obtained a sound outcome at a modest price, and the deal worked out well for both of them. - P.W. (attorney)

Jonathan was very helpful at a very stressful time not only providing good legal advice but making suggestions that help eliminate future problems. - M.S. (client)

Mr. Blado is an outstanding attorney who has an incredible depth of experience and knowledge of the law. He is able to sort out various strategies and gambits from the opponent and develop a well thought out, reasonable and effective position from which to proceed. Mr. Blado is my "go to" guy!
Even when I need routine advice about basic stuff Mr. Blado always gives me his opinion based on sound reasoning, his experience and the law.
My wife and I (and others whom we've referred) appreciate Jon and his staff for their professionalism and their expertise. - M.C. (client)

Jon knows the law! He is approachable and easy to communicate with. His trustworthy and reliable advice has been very helpful over the years. I recommend Jon highly. (client)

Jon Blado successfully resolved complex legal issues related to real estate and financial transactions. His work assisted us in the acquisition of property; review of construction and financing documents; and approval by regulatory officials for the William Factory Incubator's facilities adjacent to Interstate 5 in Tacoma. Jon's expertise in real estate and financial law allowed us to complete our projects on-time and within the estimated budget. - T.S. (client)

I know Jonathan from working with him on various cases. That includes transactional work where we have each represented clients involved in a business transaction. I have also worked with Jonathan when we have been on opposing sides in litigation. Jonathan is very professional and a strong advocate for his client, but at the same time never loses sight of what is best for his client. I would strongly recommend his services. - B.C. (attorney).

I have known Jonathan for more than 25 years through the legal community in Tacoma & Pierce County. He has always shown himself to be an honest, trustworthy individual and a true professional as an attorney. I would not hesitate to recommend him in any situation requiring legal advice, representation or services. He has also been generous in his private time, serving as Judge Advocate/legal advisor for our yacht club. - C.G. (former Deputy Clerk of Court)

To put things mildly, Nicole is a top-notch attorney and a terrific human being. (client)

Nicole Bolan is a superb lawyer with a professional grasp of the client's situation. Her communication skills enhance not only the client-lawyer relationship, but expedites the process of negotiation. Ms Bolan exhibits a willingness to expedite the process, without hampering the client's interests. She not only communicated effectively with opposing personnel, she did so without delay. I would recommend her talents to anyone I know who wants to work with an efficient, intelligent and hard-working lawyer who also is an expert in her field. (client)

Nicole has been my lawyer on several different occasions. Each time I found her to be very professional, attentive to detail, thorough. She kept me posted as to what was happening and where we were in the procedure. I had complete confidence in her abilities and was completely satisfied with the results. She helped with my estate planning and probates on two occasions. (client)

Nicole was very responsive to my needs, and kept me well informed. I let her know I was conscious of fees, and she kept this in mind, but did not sacrifice the information flow. If it needed to be said, she said it. (client)

Nicole Bolan was terrific to work with. She explained everything along the way and kept me up-to-date with the proceedings. (client)

My experience with Nicole was good. I find people who get divorced regret their choice in lawyer, but I can say with confidence that I do not feel that way. She kept me informed about my options and helped me keep a level head. She did not tell me what to do or say or tell me there was only one way to accomplish my goals. She did give me options with warnings about each avenue. She answered all my calls and emails quickly, and she was sympathetic to my needs. She seemed knowledgeable, and when she didn't know she researched the information. I felt she was always looking out for my best interest which is very hard to come by during a divorce. (client)

My husband and I retained Nicole for a relocation trial. She was great! We were in contact via email if not by phone and Nicole always kept us informed. Nicole has wonderful people skills. We were able to relocate with a quick trial and we have kept in contact with her since. Not only would I be more than happy to have Nicole represent me again I would recommend her to anyone. (client)

Nicole is very competent in her knowledge base in family law, and has been very quick and efficient in resolving matters of a difficult nature. She is also sensitive to the needs of her client, me. The list goes on and on, as to her competencies in legal matters. I would recommend her to anyone! (client)

Nicole won my lawsuit very easily. I got everything that I was suing for in the judgment. She is very professional, very intelligent and very thorough at what she does. I would recommend her to anyone needing the help of a lawyer and will use her again if I ever need to. (client)

Out of five lawyers I talked to, Nicole was the most concerned about my case. Hired her firm and they saved my whole way of life.
Follow her advice and won the important things about the case. In short:

I am an equal parent in Washington State.

My daughter was not moved out of state.

Back living in my house.

Peace of mind knowing that I was well handled and advised, and stood up for my rights.

Also, Nicole protected me from myself. (client)

I feel that Nicole Bolan is an excellent lawyer. She is efficient and always makes sure that her clients needs are being met. In the court room she is always prepared, on-time, and thinks quickly in response to the other attorney and/or the judge. I feel very comfortable when speaking with Mrs. Bolan, she is patient and understanding as well as honest about what she feels should be done and listens to any ideas that her client may have and gives great feedback. I have been very happy with Mrs. Bolan's services. (client)

I use Mr. Kiger for legal advice and to deal with homeowners who are in arrears with their HOA Dues. His office handles everything from filing liens to sending collection letters and all other legal matters including foreclosures. Mr. Kiger has been our lawyer for over 10 years and we have no intention to look for someone else. - B.W. (client)

Doug and I became acquainted when he provided legal services with a high value real estate purchase. Along with this he assisted us with other legal details associated with this purchase. We have since purchased other real estate with his legal experitse. Doug has provided legal advice and service with business issues; estate planning; and real estate land issues providing legal advice and legal documents. He has been competent; informed; and without the typical lawyer hurbris. He works with clients and is not pretentious; condescending; and dismissive. - R.L. (client)

Douglas Kiger set up my LLC. Thanks! You made the process so much easier! - N.F. (client)

I am so very grateful that I have chosen your firm, and you specifically, because I truly believe that your honesty has saved me the burden of expenses beyond what might otherwise have been cost effective in this matter. - M.B. (client).

Thank you so much. I have never had to deal with an attorney over any issues before. I thank you for your time and generosity. This has been a very difficult time for me. You will be my first pick if I need legal assistance again. - H.C. (client).

Thank you for all the work you've done on my behalf - no one could have done a better job. - D.K. (client).

Thank you again for helping me with my will and the trust. I "sing" and praise you to all my friends! - C.O. (client)

Just like to thank you for all your help you have given to me. Without you I don't know what I would have done. I'm so glad to have met you and to have worked with you, thank you again. - P.B. (client)

Doug Kiger's performance from day one through litigation has been nothing short of spectacular. I could not have retained a better attorney to represent my interests in my absence. Information and updates concerning the status were consistently provided in a timely manner and fashion. Documentation was constantly forwarded via the mail for my personal records in an organized manner. Mr. Kiger's ability to research the law and always answer questions asked or information needed was nothing short of exceptional. His honesty and sincerity while handling my case developed a trust in his ability that always allowed me to feel confident my case was being handled by a true professional who had my best interests at heart. - R.H. (client)

Please congratulate Doug on a job well done not only on my behalf but my children's as well. As a single parent providing our only source of income, the settlement of this case has allowed me to buy a new home and lessened the financial burden and stress all due to his successful litigation on my behalf. - R.H. (client).

I want to thank each of you for the outstanding professional legal services that you have provided me in my marriage dissolution case. At no time did I worry about what my attorneys were doing. Your manner gave me complete confidence that my best interests were always important to you. I want to also give a special shout-out to Nicole for her brilliant stewardship of the matter. - M.S. (client)

read more
Tell us about your case

NOTE: Labels in bold are required.

Contact Information
  1. disclaimer.
visit our personal injury site
Our Offices

Blado Kiger Bolan, P.S.
4717 South 19th St
Suite 109
Tacoma, WA 98405
Phone: 253-272-2997
Fax: 253-627-6252
Email Us | Directions

MasterCard, Visa, Discover Credit cards accepted